<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No Legitimate Interest | SC Noncompete Lawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/category/no-legitimate-interest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com</link>
	<description>Let`s Beat Your Non-Compete</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:21:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Trans-Obligation: The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is Really a Non-Compete.</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/the-non-disclosure-agreement-is-really-a-non-compete/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Legitimate Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Limitations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=617</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>So, an employee signs an employment agreement.  The agreement contains (among other things) non-compete provision and a non-disclosure provision (NDA).&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/the-non-disclosure-agreement-is-really-a-non-compete/">Trans-Obligation: The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is Really a Non-Compete.</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Physician Non-Competes Upheld by South Carolina Court of Appeals: Baugh v. Columbia Heart Clinic, P.A</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/physician-non-competes-upheld-by-south-carolina-court-of-appeals-baugh-v-columbia-heart-clinic-p-a/</link>
					<comments>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/physician-non-competes-upheld-by-south-carolina-court-of-appeals-baugh-v-columbia-heart-clinic-p-a/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Geographical Limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Legitimate Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete Trends]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=483</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In its first non-compete case involving a physicians, the South Carolina Court of Appeals used mostly well-trodden commercial case precedent to reverse a bench trial holding that the agreements were unenforceable</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/physician-non-competes-upheld-by-south-carolina-court-of-appeals-baugh-v-columbia-heart-clinic-p-a/">Physician Non-Competes Upheld by South Carolina Court of Appeals: Baugh v. Columbia Heart Clinic, P.A</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/physician-non-competes-upheld-by-south-carolina-court-of-appeals-baugh-v-columbia-heart-clinic-p-a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New 4th Circuit Case Shoots Down Non-Compete</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/new-4th-circuit-case-shoots-down-non-compete/</link>
					<comments>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/new-4th-circuit-case-shoots-down-non-compete/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[No Legitimate Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=166</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a new Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals case, in which the Court held a non-compete was unenforceable: Lapman&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/new-4th-circuit-case-shoots-down-non-compete/">New 4th Circuit Case Shoots Down Non-Compete</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/new-4th-circuit-case-shoots-down-non-compete/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
