<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Non-Compete Trends | SC Noncompete Lawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/category/non-compete-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com</link>
	<description>Let`s Beat Your Non-Compete</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 12:32:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>New South Carolina Case: Noncompete and Sale of a Business</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/new-south-carolina-case-noncompete-and-sale-of-a-business/</link>
					<comments>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/new-south-carolina-case-noncompete-and-sale-of-a-business/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geographical Limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete Trends]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This case should encourage employers and those selling their business to draft their non-competes with a more reasonable geographic scope (or else risk a court throwing the non-compete out altogether). But those who are asked to sign a non-compete should keep in mind that even if their non-compete is probably unenforceable, an employer can still sue to enforce it and cause the employee a lot of stress and attorneys’ fees.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/new-south-carolina-case-noncompete-and-sale-of-a-business/">New South Carolina Case: Noncompete and Sale of a Business</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/new-south-carolina-case-noncompete-and-sale-of-a-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Noncompetes In Court: Attorney&#8217;s Fees</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/noncompetes-in-court-attorneys-fees/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete Trends]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned in the prior post, I was in court in October (2016) and tried a non-compete case for my&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/noncompetes-in-court-attorneys-fees/">Noncompetes In Court: Attorney’s Fees</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happens When A Non-Compete Case Goes to Trial?</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/what-happens-when-a-non-compete-case-goes-to-trial/</link>
					<comments>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/what-happens-when-a-non-compete-case-goes-to-trial/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=513</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I have tried three cases in the last 12 months, but none more difficult than a non-compete case in Lexington&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/what-happens-when-a-non-compete-case-goes-to-trial/">What Happens When A Non-Compete Case Goes to Trial?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/what-happens-when-a-non-compete-case-goes-to-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Physician Non-Competes Upheld by South Carolina Court of Appeals: Baugh v. Columbia Heart Clinic, P.A</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/physician-non-competes-upheld-by-south-carolina-court-of-appeals-baugh-v-columbia-heart-clinic-p-a/</link>
					<comments>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/physician-non-competes-upheld-by-south-carolina-court-of-appeals-baugh-v-columbia-heart-clinic-p-a/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Geographical Limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Legitimate Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete Trends]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=483</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In its first non-compete case involving a physicians, the South Carolina Court of Appeals used mostly well-trodden commercial case precedent to reverse a bench trial holding that the agreements were unenforceable</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/physician-non-competes-upheld-by-south-carolina-court-of-appeals-baugh-v-columbia-heart-clinic-p-a/">Physician Non-Competes Upheld by South Carolina Court of Appeals: Baugh v. Columbia Heart Clinic, P.A</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/physician-non-competes-upheld-by-south-carolina-court-of-appeals-baugh-v-columbia-heart-clinic-p-a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Carolina Case Review: Team IA, Inc. v. Lucas</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/south-carolina-law-team-ia-inc-v-lucas/</link>
					<comments>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/south-carolina-law-team-ia-inc-v-lucas/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Forum Selection / Choice of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geographical Limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete Trends]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The most recent reported South Carolina case involving non-compete is Team IA, Inc. v. Lucas, 717 S.E.2d 103 (S.C. Ct. of App. Oct. 2011).  The case provides only modest insight into the legal landscapes of non-compete agreements, and in some ways creates a bit of uncertainty.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/south-carolina-law-team-ia-inc-v-lucas/">South Carolina Case Review: Team IA, Inc. v. Lucas</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/south-carolina-law-team-ia-inc-v-lucas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgia and Texas Follow the Trend: Non-Competes Easier to Enforce</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/georgia-texas-follow-trend-non-competes-easier-to-enforce/</link>
					<comments>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/georgia-texas-follow-trend-non-competes-easier-to-enforce/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete Trends]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It is happening.  Slowly, states are making it easier for employers to enforce non-competes.  Recently, the Texas Supreme Court abandoned&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/georgia-texas-follow-trend-non-competes-easier-to-enforce/">Georgia and Texas Follow the Trend: Non-Competes Easier to Enforce</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/georgia-texas-follow-trend-non-competes-easier-to-enforce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am Being Sued Where? Forum Selection Clauses</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/i-am-being-sued-where-forum-selection-clauses/</link>
					<comments>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/i-am-being-sued-where-forum-selection-clauses/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 23:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Forum Selection / Choice of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=394</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Too many employees who have signed a non-compete agreement fail to take notice that they have agreed to be sued in another state.  These provisions are known as "forum selection clauses." </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/i-am-being-sued-where-forum-selection-clauses/">I am Being Sued Where? Forum Selection Clauses</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/i-am-being-sued-where-forum-selection-clauses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Land of the Lost:  The Antiquated Notion of Geographically Based Non-Competes</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/geographically-based-noncompetes-south-carolina-law/</link>
					<comments>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/geographically-based-noncompetes-south-carolina-law/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Geographical Limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Secrets]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The more non-compete matters I review and litigate the more certain I am that geographically based non-competition covenants should be per se unenforceable.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/geographically-based-noncompetes-south-carolina-law/">Land of the Lost:  The Antiquated Notion of Geographically Based Non-Competes</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/geographically-based-noncompetes-south-carolina-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shepherd Law Group Study Shows Increase in Non-Compete Litigation</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/shepherd-law-group-study-shows-increase-in-non-compete-litigation/</link>
					<comments>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/shepherd-law-group-study-shows-increase-in-non-compete-litigation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete Trends]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A recent study by Shepherd Law Group shows that noncompete litigation nationwide has continued to trend upward, despite a slowing&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/shepherd-law-group-study-shows-increase-in-non-compete-litigation/">Shepherd Law Group Study Shows Increase in Non-Compete Litigation</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/shepherd-law-group-study-shows-increase-in-non-compete-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Bimbo By Any Other Name: Third Circuit Upholds “Inevitable Disclosure” Injunction</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/a-bimbo-by-any-other-name-third-circuit-upholds-inevitable-disclosure-injunction/</link>
					<comments>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/a-bimbo-by-any-other-name-third-circuit-upholds-inevitable-disclosure-injunction/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Non-Compete Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Secrets]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Bimbo Sues the Muffin Man, I briefly discussed the inevitable disclosure case filed by Bimbo Bakeries against a former&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/a-bimbo-by-any-other-name-third-circuit-upholds-inevitable-disclosure-injunction/">A Bimbo By Any Other Name: Third Circuit Upholds “Inevitable Disclosure” Injunction</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/a-bimbo-by-any-other-name-third-circuit-upholds-inevitable-disclosure-injunction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
