<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Case Study | SC Noncompete Lawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/tag/case-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com</link>
	<description>Let`s Beat Your Non-Compete</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:09:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>When are Client Lists Trade Secrets?  A Case Study: Atwood Agency v. Black</title>
		<link>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/when-are-client-lists-trade-secrets-a-case-study-atwood-agency-v-black/</link>
					<comments>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/when-are-client-lists-trade-secrets-a-case-study-atwood-agency-v-black/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scnoncompete.wpengine.com/?p=204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A recurring issue in my practice is whether information known by a former employee is a “trade secret.”  Many times the information at issue is a client list or simply the identify of clients and/or customers.  The South Carolina Supreme Court considered this issue in the case of Atwood Agency v. Black, 374 S.C. 68, 646 S.E.2d 882 (S.C. 2007).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/when-are-client-lists-trade-secrets-a-case-study-atwood-agency-v-black/">When are Client Lists Trade Secrets?  A Case Study: Atwood Agency v. Black</a> first appeared on <a href="https://scnoncompetelawyer.com">SC Noncompete Lawyer</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scnoncompetelawyer.com/when-are-client-lists-trade-secrets-a-case-study-atwood-agency-v-black/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
